
PERFECT PAPER SOLUTION BY ABHAYM ACADEMY


A mutual fund company is an investment company that receives money from investors for the sole purpose to invest in stocks, bonds, and other securities for the benefit of the investors. A mutual is the portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other securities that generate profits for the investor, or shareholder of the mutual fund. A mutual fund allows an investor with less money to diversify his holdings for greater safety and to benefit from the expertise of professional fund managers. Mutual funds are generally safer, but less profitable, than stocks, and riskier, but more profitable than bonds or bank accounts, although its profit-risk profile can vary widely, depending on the fund's investment objective.Most mutual funds areopen-end funds, which sells new shares continuously or buys them back from the shareholder (redeems them), dealing directly with the investor (no-load funds) or through broker-dealers, who receive the sales load of a buy or sell order.The purchase price is the net asset value (NAV) at the end of the trading day, which is the total assets of the fund minus its liabilities divided by the number of shares outstanding for that day
In finance, an electronic trading platform also known as an online trading platform, is a computer software program that can be used to place orders for financial products over a network with a financial intermediary. This includes products such as stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities and derivatives with a financial intermediary, such as brokers, market makers, Investment banks or stock exchanges. Such platforms allow electronic trading to be carried out by users from any location and are in contrast to traditional floor trading using open outcry and telephone based trading.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER
In finance, an electronic trading platform also known as an online trading platform, is a computer software program that can be used to place orders for financial products over a network with a financial intermediary. This includes products such as stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities and derivatives with a financial intermediary, such as brokers, market makers, Investment banks or stock exchanges. Such platforms allow electronic trading to be carried out by users from any location and are in contrast to traditional floor trading using open outcry and telephone based trading.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER
When it comes to medical negligence, the laws are stacked in favour of doctors as it has to be proved that he did not do something which is ‘normal practice’.A metropolitan magistrate on Tuesday convicted Dr Praful Desai, a senior surgeon, of medical negligence while treating ex-IAS officer PC Singhi’s wife, a cancer patient, 24 years ago. But such cases are rare, say lawyers.The Supreme Court in a judgment last year stated clearly that such cases should be treated differently, and doctors should be able to practice with a free mind. “To prosecute a medical professional for criminal negligence it must be shown that the doctor did something or failed to do something which in the given circumstances no medical professional in his ordinary senses and prudence would have done or failed to do,” the bench noted.“Criminal negligence is most difficult to prove. You need to prove intention. For medical negligence, the lawyer should prove that the doctor has failed to do what he has been required to
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THIS PAPER
When it comes to medical negligence, the laws are stacked in favour of doctors as it has to be proved that he did not do something which is ‘normal practice’.A metropolitan magistrate on Tuesday convicted Dr Praful Desai, a senior surgeon, of medical negligence while treating ex-IAS officer PC Singhi’s wife, a cancer patient, 24 years ago. But such cases are rare, say lawyers.The Supreme Court in a judgment last year stated clearly that such cases should be treated differently, and doctors should be able to practice with a free mind. “To prosecute a medical professional for criminal negligence it must be shown that the doctor did something or failed to do something which in the given circumstances no medical professional in his ordinary senses and prudence would have done or failed to do,” the bench noted.“Criminal negligence is most difficult to prove. You need to prove intention. For medical negligence, the lawyer should prove that the doctor has failed to do what he has been required to